On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:17:39AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:13:53AM +0200, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: > > snprintf(buffer, SPAMD_BUFLEN, > > - "CHECK SPAMC/1.2\r\nContent-length: %d\r\n\r\n", > > - (unsigned int)(priv->priv_msgcount + strlen(rcvhdr))); > > + "CHECK SPAMC/1.2\r\n" > > + "Content-length: %d\r\n" > > + "User: %s\r\n\r\n", > > + (unsigned int)(priv->priv_msgcount + strlen(rcvhdr)), > > + priv->priv_queueid); > > Is it reasonable to abuse the User field? I'm not entirely sure but this (optional) header seems to be pretty useless otherwise. We could add a prefix in order to make it distinguishable from ordinary users. But OTOH, we could also do nothing since all you need in order to group your maillog by smtp-sessions is already there (queueid/msgid). Petar Bogdanovic
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Message Information passed to and from spamd
2009-05-11 by Petar Bogdanovic