> I suspect it should be initialized to DKIM_NOSIG, so that we get this > result when there is no signature. I thought that might be the case, however it doesn't explain what is going on with dkim_verify when it sees a dkim header. I'll try pushing a signed message through when DKIM_NOSIG is set. I suspect that dkim_verify will not change priv_dkimstat and it will still end up as NOSIG. John
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] DKIM and ACL syntax
2010-09-17 by John Wood