Milter-greylist

Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> Using (nonexisting) "ZZ" country code as alias for "IP isn't" in
>> GeoIP DB"? It is IMO good solution and maybe should be taken as
>> documented official new value for testing. And maybe when there
>> would be another pseudocode for private address space, then we got
>> two additional country values for testing.
> 
> Well, if  GeoIP fail reports ZZ, then you can have acl to test local
> network without acl to test country code, no need to hardcode the logic.
> 
> Z1 and Z2 are invalid ISO 3166-1 country code, by the way.

Of course invalid, I was thinking when it should be used only for
milter internal purposes, then it is suitable - it will not interfere
with real country codes.
But I'll leave it up to Your deliberation.

Thanks, Franta Hanzlik