Milter-greylist

Jim Klimov <jimklimov@...> wrote:

> The way I read it, the standard only determines the actions about
> success, and not about failure 

If it is not broken, do not fix it. The situation you think about is
usually worded in standards as "the buffer content in case of failure is
undefined", which is not the case here. Moreover, I have to think hard
on how this could be implemented with a dirty output buffer on failure.

Let us first find an instance where there is a problem here, then we
will fix it. I doubt we will encounter such a situation.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...