Hi, In <alpine.LNX.2.02.1406212302210.1949@...> "[milter-greylist] tarpit auto-whitelisting" on Sat, 21 Jun 2014 23:05:05 +0200, "Frank Doepper fd@... [milter-greylist]" <milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > Am 03.09.09 um 15:26 schrieb Kouhei Sutou: > >> acl whitelist tarpit 65s >> >> This ACL means that clients that can wait a response in >> 65s are whitelisted. If the clients access again, they are >> acceptted without lazy response because they are in >> auto-whitelist. > > It seems that this auto-whitelisting does not work. Assumed that the > sender is able to wait, messages are accepted after waiting, but > subsequent messages with identical host,from,rcpt tuples have to wait > again and again. No AUTO line (no line at all) is put into the DB. > > With a test config snippet > > racl whitelist rcpt /b/ tarpit 10s > > debugging output is > > Jun 19 15:58:23 host milter-greylist: created: x.x.x.x from <a> to <b> delayed for 00:30:00 > Jun 19 15:58:33 host milter-greylist: removed: x.x.x.x from <a> to <b> > Jun 19 15:58:33 host sm-mta[26004]: s5JDwMg9026004: from=<a>, size=217, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<id@host>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v6, relay=relay [x.x.x.x] > Jun 19 15:58:33 host sm-mta[26004]: s5JDwMg9026004: Milter add: header: X-Greylist: Recipient e-mail whitelisted, Sender IP whitelisted by MX, Message whitelisted by tarpit 10s, ACL 127 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (host [y.y.y.y]); Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:58:33 +0200 (CEST) > > Do I miss something? All I need is the documented behaviour. Could you also provide expected debugging output? I can't understand about the expected behavior yet. Thanks, -- kou
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] tarpit auto-whitelisting
2014-06-24 by Kouhei Sutou
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.