Quoting "Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@... [milter-greylist]" <milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com>: > � > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:22:26PM +0300, Can ?irin > sirincan@... [milter-greylist] wrote: >> racl blacklist \ >> not sm_macro "null" \ >> ratelimit "high_limit" \ >> msg "High limit exceeded." > > Why blacklist? If I understand correctly, the message cannot ever pass > the rule. > Blacklist, because I do not want the authenticated users to send too many messages in a particular time. This is ratelimiting, am i wrong? If you look at my previous message, there are two ratelimit rule in my conf. The message will pass if the counter is lower than the limit. The point is when a message pass through n amount of ratelimit rule, which is matched for all; its counter increases n by n in one greylist rule checking process. I think it is clear so far. >> What is the disadvantage of taking counter seperated for every >> ratelimit rule? > > It is more difficult to maintain for you. In my opinion, every ratelimit rule has its own counter. That's why rules can be written from generic to specific. Thanks Can
Message
Re: {Disarmed} Re: [milter-greylist] Rate Limit Rules
2016-11-09 by Can Şirin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.