Milter-greylist

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:22:19AM +0100, manu@... wrote:
> Remy Card <Remy.Card@...> wrote:
> > As I understand the code, milter-greylist tells the peers
> > about tuples that are removed from the pending list and added to the
> > autowhite list, i.e. mails that have been delayed and that are autowhitelisted
> > for the first time.
> 
> Yes, this has been a known minor bug for a while. 

	Ok.  I did not know about this since I am quite new to this list.

> >       I do not have a patch for this problem (the version of milter-greylist
> > that I use is quite different from the standard one and a patch against it
> > would be unusable by anybody but me) but I think that the problem could be
> > solved by adding a call to peer_delete() in autowhite_add() when an entry
> > is found in the autowhite list and its life time is prolongated, i.e. when
> > an entry is autowhitelisted for more time.  The code could be similar to
> > the one in pending_check() when the greylist delay is over, I think.
> 
> Sounds good. Someone test that fix?

	Note that this could be a bit more complex than what I wrote.  After
re-reading the code and thinking of it again, I believe that a fictive
pending record should be allocated and initialized to be used as a
parameter to peer_delete().  The fictive record should not be added to
the pending list.

		R\ufffdmy