Jack L. Stone <jacks@...> wrote: > In reading more, it becomes apparent that the lack of response to the > callback could be many reasons unrelated to spammers/junkers. Callback > sounds like a good idea at first blush. Greylisting can cause callback to tempfail, but the callback scheme still have some benefits. When you get a permanent failure, I beleive you have a very strong hint that the sender address is invalid (and thus that the message should be rejectec) > Also, it was apparently having troubles with corrupted Berkely DB 3+. I spent a lot of time trying to move milter-greylist database to Berkeley DB, but I finnally gave up. The only goal of the database dump is to recover after a crash, and I could not get any garantee of having the database not corrupted after a crash. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] The callback
2004-12-07 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.