Milter-greylist

Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@...> wrote:

> Some questions to be answered by users and contributors, so that we get
> an idea of what we are about to integrate and how:

And here are my own anwsers:
 
> 1) Do we want to use sendmail access DB as a greylist/whitelist source?

Why not, a new feature that cannot harm. But I think there should be a
noaccessdb configuration option to switch it off, like we have for SPF
and SMTP auth.

> 2) If we do, do we need the config file to support all the features the
> sendmail access DB has?

It seems that the sendmail DB will allow very flexible things, and it
will be hard to support all of them in milter-greylist config file, so
that should probably not be a goal. 

> 3) Do we want to merge all whitelisting methods into the new ACL
> mecanism? Example: being able to tell that SPF whitelisting will work
> for user foo but not for user bar, or that sendmail DB whitelisting will
> not apply to /.*@sub\.domain\.net/

That seems highly desirable, but it seems to me that we can do that
later: no need to delay the access DB support for that. 

Comments? 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent 
le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
manu@...