MOTM

In a message dated 3/4/2001 12:22:24 PM, oakley@... 
writes:

>>it would be a custom job to get a pot that reacted in log fashion for
>half its travel, and in reverse log fashion for the other half, no?
>
>You can do this with a load on the pot wiper, say a 10K resistor on a
>100K pot. But I think a linear pot is better for most uses.

I'm not sure if this is what Tony meant, but it might be a better choice to 
go linear on all pots (or Juergen's idea on all the pots -- nice to see you 
back JH!) if only for the uniformity of operation. Correct me if I'm wrong 
here guys, but this module seems to be more of a "pre-mixer" (since there's 
no output level controls) in that levels wouldn't typically be adjusted on 
the fly. The inputs might have a "touchy" quality to them, but I'd think that 
would be less strange than "pot 1 operates this way, pot 2 operates a little 
differently, and pot 3 operates differently still!"

In fact, it might be nice to have reversing attenuators on all the inputs (I 
can hear Paul groan from here) -- hey Moe, great idea about mixing waves from 
the same VCO!
JB