MOTM

I have to agree completely with Microtonal on this one, my 
preferences are also...

1.  Dual VCA/Panner/Fader
2.  Pulse Divider
3.  NOT the microVCO, something else

>As Tom says, the Dual VCA/Panner/Fader adds functionality to the MOTM system
>that isn't available elsewhere.  It also makes stereo panning much easier.
>
>Where I disagree is the Pulse Divider.  I look at this as mostly a control
>voltage tool.  Since it is microcontroller based, it may not even work that
>well at audio frequencies - I would expect it might have some jitter.  This
>is a great complement to a sequencer for getting nonrepetitive note
>durations and polyrhythmic textures.
>
>The microVCO still confounds me.  Why a 1U module that duplicates
>functionality when there are so many things missing from MOTM.  I'll give a
>few examples:
>
>Phaser
>Variable Slope Filter
>Waveshapers
>Analog Shift Register
>Envelope Follower
>Preamp
>Sequencer
>VC Envelope Generator
>Quantizer
>Frequency Shifter
>Boolean Logic
>Comparator/Schmitt Triggers
>Control Voltage Modifiers
>
>This is the #1 reason that new customers to the modular field choose a Serge
>over MOTM.  I know, I see this on the Serge list all the time.  It limits
>the customer base of MOTM, thereby limiting the sales that Paul will see,
>thereby limiting the expansion of MOTM.
>
>John Loffink
>microtonal@...
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Juskiw                                            scott@...