Stay away from foil shield in "moving" applications. It's EXCELLENT for permanent or semi-permanent installations, but if you use it for MOTM patching, you will break down the foil and it will be a POS cable after a while. Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: markus [mailto:djarum11@...] > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:39 AM > To: motm@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [motm] cable specs > > > i'm comparing samples of belden cable for > MOTM patch cables and for general line-level studio > wiring. > > so far i like the thinner style (very similar to the > gray belden wire paul uses for audio signals inside > the modules: light, flexible, small) and the specs > (tinned copper, capacitance is only 12pF/foot, > impedance is 110 ohms) of belden 1800B. however the > AWG is only 24 in this twisted pair, foil shield with > drain wire type of cable. is 24 AWG too thin for > modular patch cables? how about for longer runs > within the studio? is a foil shield OK or is a braid > really necessary (yes there are computers in the > studio) ? > > other cables i am considering are the belden 1696A > (too thick and inflexible for patch cables IMO but may > be good for the rest of the studio): 22 AWG, tinned > copper, twisted pair, foil shield AND braid shield, > drain wire, heavy duty PVC jacket, capacitance > 13pF/foot > > and belden 83393, similar to above with a capacitance > of 22pF per foot, 20 AWG, no extra braided shield, and > a thick rubbery silicone jacket. > > prior to this i was making line-level cables with > canare starquad, which is a mic cable and has far too > high a capacitance to be used for line level signals. > try using this stuff as a guitar cord, for example, > and it acts as a LPF - your high end goes out the > window. (around 60 pF/foot) > > /technical spew off > mark > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
RE: [motm] cable specs
2001-07-14 by Tony Karavidas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.