We're on all this, hee hee hee. Paul S. > > It would have to be noticeably different, otherwise you are going to get > all of these people complaining that it doesn't sound exactly like the Moog > filter. This is because the various Moog filters sound different, and no > one "clone" can be made to sound exactly like all of them. Even Mini Moogs > vary amongst themselves. I'm guessing this due to the availability of > different parts over the years or different tolerances in transistor > matching when they were built. Nevermind the coloration of the VCA > following the VCF when patching the Mini Moog as a "stand alone" filter. > > >Filters are based on mathematical polynomials. You aren't going to get a > >'new' polynomial. What you get > >are different ways to implement them. 95% of the time, it's the parts > >themselves that make a difference. > > You obviously know much more about this than I do, but looking at filters > as an end-user, it seems that existing filter designs may be improved > significantly by adding new controls such as variable mode, variable slope, > variable width, switchable feedback paths, VC resonance, etc. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.