Seconded! The more VC control the better. Something like what is described below would be absolutely sick. The MS-20 is still my current favorite filter, though - so much character. --- In motm@y..., Jeffrey Pontius <jpont@k...> wrote: > > You obviously know much more about this than I do, but looking at filters > > as an end-user, it seems that existing filter designs may be improved > > significantly by adding new controls such as variable mode, variable slope, > > variable width, switchable feedback paths, VC resonance, etc. > > > I think Mark has made one of the best suggestions about filters that I've > seen in a while, especially from a user's standpoint. These would all be > very useful, IMHO. One of the things that appealed to me about Serge > before I decided to go MOTM was the Serge variable slope filter. The > 'feedback' input on the Oakley ladder filter is a very nice option. VC > control of the filter type on the anticipated motm SEM would be very nice > (as may already be in progress). > > Jeff
Message
Re: Moog ladder plan
2001-08-23 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.