> When I saw this come up out of nowhere I immediately thought the timing has > something to do with all the talk on the Synth.com board. Sure enough. Well, it wasn't exactly "out of nowhere". JH has been working on it for months. Although some find it hard to believe, there is constant R&D going on for new modules. But introduction is Catch-22: introduce modules, get swamped, can't R&D. So, it's a trade-off of backlog (current) versus backlog (the train's a'comin'). I am making good strides in the assembled backlog, so 'new' stuff starts getting 'physical' starting Monday. NAMM actually is a great whip to get me going :) Planning ahead: the last ship day of the year is Dec. 15th. Since NAMM is in the middle of Jan. don't expect much from Dec. 15th until I get back on Jan 22nd. > > would give an opportunity to include some features we don't have on the > current filters, like an overdrive knob. Access to the feedback path would > also be nice (Oakley type), but if need be the same thing can be done with > external patching. Both the MOTM-440 and MOTM-420 can be overdriven (it takes 2 or 3 inputs, though). The upcoming dual VCA has a different sort of overdrive. > > However, as somebody who has a Moogerfooger filter anyway, I'm more desperate > a LP/BP/HP/Notch multimode filter. That's currently the weak link in the > MOTM filter lineup. MOTM-420 has 3 out of 4 :) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Actress CRYSTAL BERNARD Resources: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > GACK! I went to high school with her and her better-looking sister Robyn. Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] Moog ladder plan
2001-08-24 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.