Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] uVCO range poll

2001-11-24 by George Kisslak

While I agree that the upper range of the coarse knob (over 30Khz) is not
really that useful and eats up some of the knob range, I would prefer to
keep the 310 adjustments the same as the 300.  If this is not an option,
then I would vote 'C'.

Alternatively...

If the coarse range is determined by only one resistor, then maybe make a
"resistor value-coarse range" chart in the instructions and allow the kit
builder to decide the range.  Maybe this could be done for the 300 as well?
(uh-oh)

Hopefully it will be possible to reduce the range of the fine knob to about
2 semitones via one resistor change, as described in Stooge Larry's 300 mod.
(I've made that mod to my 300s - makes it less touchy when adjusting beat
frequencies.)

See what happens when you ask for input?  ;)

George

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Schreiber <synth1@...>
> a) 10Hz to 10Khz
> b) 2Hz to 18Khz
> c) 0.5Hz to 30Khz
> ???

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.