I agree, Jurgen's idea is brilliant. Moe >>>> OK, Jurgen wins. --- In motm@y..., jhaible@t... wrote: > IMO, the uLFO should not be a scaled down version > of the big one, but something to complement it. > > So here's a completely different idea: > > What about an "Animation LFO" ? > To breathe life into static patches, you need a lot of > subtle modulation rather than the most exciting of > waveshapes. <<<<
Message
Re: Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by mate_stubb