MOTM

> Last night I tried different PW settings (with no PWM) and, without any 
> timbre modulation I find I much prefer square waves -- richer, more full 
> bodied (can't think of any more coffee metaphors at the moment). So I'm 
> wondering if you tend to use one setting such that maybe a switch could
give 
> you appropriate settings like SQUARE, 70%, and LEAD, or if the pot is
really 
> worth it -- inquiring minds want to know.
> 
> JB

Well, I think the pot is really worth it on the 300 when coupled with PWM
input.  However, with Paul's latest suggestion for a tri and VARiable
output that shapes between a 50% square and saw for the 310, I have pushed
PWM control completely off my wish list.  I think Paul's latest post hit
that last soft spot for having room for 310s in the system.  That shaping
(although limited) that the 300 will not do.  I don't need no stinkin' PWM
knob.  Each voice could have one 310 and still sync up too.  

LH