MOTM

I'll second this.  The Roland filters have a very unique sound.  Even the variations
between the Roland analog products seem to have a basic character of the filter that
seems unique to Roland.  I posted a short review awhile back about the two kinds of
System 700 filters.  They have a unique sound that is not like any of the current
MOTM filters.  Paul has mentioned the importance of filters on the character of a
synth...  This is another one of those "characters".  Now when folks are talking
about Roland filters, they usually mean the TB-303.  I don't know that I would be
that specific.  I think there is something to the character of Roland filters that
applies to all of them.  That would be the "essence" that MOTM should be looking to
provide...IMHO.

   Eric


> > >2)    roland / juno filter
> > why??
> 
> i loved my juno 6, but hated it for a complete lack of control options (and
> i am no keyboard player), it was my first ever (owned) synth and now i've
> sold it - so it's a love story really - but i do like that filter, i've sold
> all my synths on the basis that they're either crap or i can replace them
> with modules - i'll be able to realise this when the CS filter shows up next
> year, if a roland juno filter shows up, and when i work out how to emulate
> the sample & hold on an SH101, so classic synth questions to the list:
> 
> the roland juno filter was different to the roland SH / MC / TB filter
> wasn't it..?
> is the CS filter similar to the CS5 filter or were they totally different
> beasts..?
> was the SH101 sample and hold quantized to the nearest semi-tone..?
> 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com