Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] MOTM Consistency

2002-02-20 by Paul Schreiber

Some earlier modules don't have the 'fine' tick marks on the knobs. That's because the 1st
silkscreener couldn't screen them.

So, after I got rid of them, I added the 'fine' ticks.

Paul S.

----- Original Message -----
From: "sucrosemusic" <sucrosemusic@...>
To: <motm@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: [motm] MOTM Consistency


> I remember an interesting point about MOTM being the consistency, the
> jacks always in a row on the bottom, etc.  From looking at pictures
> on the MOTM-110, it appears to be a bit of an anomaly.  Lining that
> image up next to an MOTM-410, the pots are scaled vertically
> differently.  Is there a convention now that didn't exist then?  Is
> there any convention at all?  The consistiency thing might prove
> tough to maintain with weirder modules like a giant sequencer.  Just
> curious, that's all.  (Also, the proposed MiniMoe 3U doesn't follow
> the convention at all.  Grin)
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.