Thanks, Terry. Glad to know I'm normal :) I've hadseveral replies to this post both on and off list. I will summarize these tonight and post them. I might also post screenshots of the waveforms. I'm still alittle confused... Mike --- In motm@y..., KA4HJH <ka4hjh@g...> wrote: > >Let's start with the SQUARE out: it's not square! It goes straight > >up, then exponentially down, creating a sort-of fast-attack > >exponential-decay wave form above zero, then inverts the same > >waveform below zero. Could this be why the square output has always > >seemd a little buzzy to me? Not a bad thing, mind you. > > Your sound card's sampling rate is way too low. Try bumping it up to 1 MHz > or so and the waveform will look very square. ;-) > > Seriously, that's what a square wave looks like without all the high > frequency harmonics. Kinda scary but normal. > -- > > Terry Bowman, KA4HJH > "The Mac Doctor" > > "By the end of Chuck Statler's 'Rock Videos' of Devo we agreed that even if > Devo did not take the stage it was still the best concert any of us had > ever attended." --Kim Thayil (Soundgardern), 1995
Message
Re: waveforms
2002-03-21 by mmarsh100
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.