MOTM

I'll do that! (Midi it)... JUST KIDDING!!!!!!

The AP is a nice tool!

Have fun,
Tony



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:12 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com; mbedtom@...
> Subject: Re: [motm] AP Plots & Specs
>
>
> First off, the intent is NOT other module bashing. The LAST THING
> ON EARTH that I want to get
> into is the tired "specs don't matter" issue. They matter to ME,
> and that's why I got the AP
> (besides, the thing is so cool. Next to my Mark Levinson 383 amp,
> it's the most beautifully made
> piece of gear I have ever seen (looking inside)).
>
> Unless you are *quite familar* with graphs of this sort, the data
> means little. That's why you
> won't see this "formally" anywhere. I get beat over the head
> enough as it is touting MOTM as "the
> best". If I try to 'prove' it, I'll get pounded even more.
>
> In the Moog filter case, I wanted to verify that the MOTM-490's
> noise floor was at -100dB or
> better. I also wanted to see the THD+N plot over *frequency*,
> because the *shape* of the curve
> needs to resemble the Moog 904A in order to be "moog-like". I
> also wanted to verify the 904A is
> designed (as is the MoogerFooger) for *very small* signals (like
> 300mv pk-pk) which is the THD vs
> amplitude plots (not shown).
>
> The AP is just another "tool in the arsenal". It's a geekfest. I
> just like to ponder how they
> generate a sine wave oscillator that sweeps from DC to 350Khz,
> with THD+N at -153dB and amplitude
> control from 0 to 40V pk-pk, settable to 0.01dB. No wonder it
> costs so much :) All I need is a
> MIDI input........
>
> Paul S.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>