Everyone is talking about exciting strings with transducers in this discussion, but I suspect we are all missing the point. Maybe what Ken is trying to do is excite the body cavity of an acoustic instrument with a synthesized waveform, then mic it for recording. I'll bet you could get a much better synthesized solo violin by using a resonating body as your natural formant filter. If this is the case, you don't need the strings at all, just a means to make the body vibrate from the synth's output. Ken, is this what you were after? Moe
Message
Re: transducers, input or output?
2002-11-04 by mate_stubb