MOTM

Ditto. By all means, 1x6 CV mixer w/ 2x3 option now, and later a stereo VC
pannable output mixer.

Dave Bradley
Principal Software Engineer
Engineering Animation, Inc.
daveb@...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve [mailto:eboyz@...]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 11:39 PM
> To: motm@onelist.com
> Subject: [motm] Re: MOTM State of the Union
>
>
> From: Steve <eboyz@...>
>
> I too would like the idea of the mixer having a switch to select
> between 1 x 6 or 2
> x 3.  I'd recommend making this mixer now and then down the road
> making a CV
> controlled output module.  So you could use CV's to control level
> and pan, you guys
> feel free to fill in the ideas on this module.  Point being it
> would be better to
> have a module dedicated to the 'output' duties.
>
> Steve
>
> Christopher Jeris wrote:
>
> > From: Christopher Jeris <cjeris@...>
> >
> > An NSA packet sniffer claiming to be JWBarlow@... wrote:
> > > Let me STRONGLY suggest that you put in a switch and a second
> output, so that
> > > it can be used as either  a single 6 input mixer OR as TWO
> independent THREE
> > > INPUT MIXERS. The lack of mixing inputs on some of the MOTM modules
> > > (understandable considering the cost of pots and knobs),
> causes one to highly
> > > desire a few 2-3 input mixers for CV and signal inputs.
> Really the only time I
> > > need a 6 input mixer is right before the amp, so I just use a
> small mixing
> > > board for output (plus you gotta pan some of those 6 across
> the stereo field).
> > >
> > > In terms of pots I would recommend linear because of CV, and because I
> > > typically use a mixing board to change audio levels during recording.
> >
> > What he said.  _Exactly_ what he said.