Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: Recording software

2002-12-05 by Mike Marsh

*sigh* I have both, and prefer Cool Edit Pro, based on the same 
criteria. But I use SF all the time, as well. I have Strats and Les 
Pauls and use them at different times, too.

(Cool Edit Pro 2.0 vs SF 6.0)

Mike

--- In motm@y..., Neil Bradley <nb@s...> wrote:
> > Audio Editors are like text editors; you'll probably hear lots of
> > religious fervor about one or another.  Pick one and jam!
> 
> Religious fervor aside, I've used Cool Edit Pro and Sound Forge 6, 
and for
> me SF 6 is head and shoulders above Cool Edit Pro in sound quality 
in the
> EQ, effects, and pitch/time shifting. It's quite a bit more spendy,
> though...
> 
> -->Neil
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Neil Bradley            In the land of the blind, the one eyed man 
is not
> Synthcom Systems, Inc.  king - he's a prisoner.
> ICQ #29402898

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.