MOTM

>
> > AUX1 AUX2 AUX3 AUX4
> > VEL1 VEL2 VEL3 VEL4
> > GAT1 GAT2 GAT3 GAT4
> > C-V1 C-V2 C-V3 C-V4

OK folks, it's a *dead heat*. I need to decide by midnight tonite. Start stuffing the ballot box.

>
> Also, are the buttons going to be the same style at
> the '600?  They don't look the same at all.
> Consistancy is very important IMO.

They are not the same style, as fitting on the panel is even *more* important :)

And, these buttons are only used 0.01% of the frequency as the uSeq buttons. I haven't used the
front panel buttons on my Pro 2000 in about 2 years :) MIDI-CV converters tend to be "set and
forget".

>
> Is the jack vertical spacing the same as on other
> modules?

Yes and no.

In order to clear the bottom rail, the jacks are all offset upwards (relative to existing
modules) about 0.200 inches. The row-to-row spacing is the same, 1.00 inch. What this means is
that these modules (uSeq and MIDI-CV) jacks are not aligned with the other module's rows.

Also, be aware that the jacks are on pc boards about 1.5" deep. If you have a *slanted cabinet*
in mind, chances are that these modules *will not fit* into the bottom cabinet row, because the
jack pcb will collide with the cabinet bottom. You will have to add about a 7/8" strip across the
bottom to allow the tilted boards clearance.

Paul S.