Yes it is, but rows rhymes :) --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote: > Err, is that Moe's "columns"? I'm confused! > > Paul S. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <mmarsh@s...> > To: <motm@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:17 AM > Subject: [motm] Re: 650 > > > > > > I vote for Moe's rows... > > > > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > AUX1 AUX2 AUX3 AUX4 > > > > > VEL1 VEL2 VEL3 VEL4 > > > > > GAT1 GAT2 GAT3 GAT4 > > > > > C-V1 C-V2 C-V3 C-V4 > > > > > > OK folks, it's a *dead heat*. I need to decide by midnight tonite. > > Start stuffing the ballot box. > > > > > > > > > > > Also, are the buttons going to be the same style at > > > > the '600? They don't look the same at all. > > > > Consistancy is very important IMO. > > > > > > They are not the same style, as fitting on the panel is even *more* > > important :) > > > > > > And, these buttons are only used 0.01% of the frequency as the uSeq > > buttons. I haven't used the > > > front panel buttons on my Pro 2000 in about 2 years :) MIDI-CV > > converters tend to be "set and > > > forget". > > > > > > > > > > > Is the jack vertical spacing the same as on other > > > > modules? > > > > > > Yes and no. > > > > > > In order to clear the bottom rail, the jacks are all offset upwards > > (relative to existing > > > modules) about 0.200 inches. The row-to-row spacing is the same, > > 1.00 inch. What this means is > > > that these modules (uSeq and MIDI-CV) jacks are not aligned with the > > other module's rows. > > > > > > Also, be aware that the jacks are on pc boards about 1.5" deep. If > > you have a *slanted cabinet* > > > in mind, chances are that these modules *will not fit* into the > > bottom cabinet row, because the > > > jack pcb will collide with the cabinet bottom. You will have to add > > about a 7/8" strip across the > > > bottom to allow the tilted boards clearance. > > > > > > Paul S. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >
Message
Re: 650
2002-12-10 by Mike Marsh <mmarsh@stellcom.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.