For those few of you who aren't familiar with the socketed vs. unsocketed issue.... Chips that are either expensive or hard to obtain go in sockets. This lessens the chance for damage during soldering. It also allows the chip to be placed on the board as the very last component. Chips that are cheap and/or readily available are directly soldered to the PCB. Skipping the sockets prevents the chips wiggling loose during transport (or earthquakes). It also eliminates any possibility of corrosion building up between the pins and the socket which can sometimes lead to an intermittent connections or no connection at all. Paul has done an excellent job of removing any dependence on dedicated ICs. The most popular of these, CEM and SSM, have not been manufactured in many years. This allows for this ever dwindling stockpile to be used for replacement parts in vintage synths. It allow makes MOTM easier and cheaper to repair with off-the-shelf components. Some might argue that it makes it more reliable too. A few current modular and synth designers (who will remain nameless here) have opted not to go this route and eat up the remaining known supplies of chips--unfortunate to say the least. Enough rambling for now. I hope this helps explain some things for people that are a bit newer here. --Shemp Coming up on my 4th anniversary!!!!! > MOTM-110 VCA/RM > * Replaced by MOTM-190 (and upcoming MOTM-130) > * '110 utilized CEM 3330 Dual VCA chip > * One of few socketed chips in MOTM line > * New modules eliminate CEM 3330 reliance > * New modules employ discreet circuitry __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: [motm] Retired Modules
2003-02-28 by Tentochi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.