MOTM

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@w...> wrote:
> Er, not only opinionated but a rotten speller.  I meant 'mixers' 
> not 'mxers'...
> 
> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <mmarsh@w...> wrote:
> > Horse manure.  It'll only make your life easier if you do Konkuro-
> > style patches (not a bad thing, mind you).  Experiment and find 
> what 
> > works for you.  For me, some things work grouped by function, 
> others 
> > do not.  I have mults, mxers and lfos scattered throughout my 
rig, 
> > but oscillators and filters grouped.  Go figure, but it works for 
> me.
> > 
> > Mike, also strongly opinionated
> > 
> > --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "konkuro" <konkuro@a...> wrote:
> > > >So how does one arrange modules such that over time, one spends
> > > more time making glorious noises and an ever-decreasing amount 
of 
> > time
> > > learning how to use the system? Thank you in advance.<
> > > 
> > > Modules should always be grouped by function.  Do you hear me?  
> > > ALWAYS. Do not listen to anybody else on this.
> > > 
> > > Signal flow should be left to right 
> > > (generation>modification>amplification) and top to bottom 
> (control 
> > > modules on the bottom). Diagrams should follow the same scheme.
> > > 
> > > Do this and life will be a LOT easier.
> > > 
> > > Konkuro has spoken (as he does so very often).
> > > 
> > > johnm