> Dave Bradley wrote: > OK, so when you plug in the jack, the pot retracts into the panel; you have > a specially made knob for it that collapses down to the size of the shaft. > That way, all VISIBLE controls operate at all times. Or, you could just grey > it out when it's not available (Windows joke). > Uh, never mind. OK, let me play this game. As much as I totally love both of Dave's suggestions, I don't think they are practical. I am certain Paul could design the retracting option. However, I am certain that I cannot afford it. I don't like option # 2 because MOTM is one place in my electronics that I don't want Bill Gates involved. <grin> Thanks for the humor Dave. However, seriously, here is one more thought without specifying how it would work (Paul figures that out) 8 jacks 8 pots no 6:1 3:2 switch Function is so that with only the A output plugged in it functions 6:1. But with each master controlling the respective three it would for separate operation. When B output is plugged in the masters separate into both A and B outputs. So instead of a 6:1 or 3:2, It would really be a 3:2:1 or 3:2. If this ideas sucks, don't blame me, I admit to not knowing anything. One more thought and then I will shut up on the subject (I love this process of idea sharing). How about if one of the master pots has a push pull switch on the shaft. When you pull that knob out, it becomes disabled as the second master and converts the mixer to 6:1. The violation of MOTM rule that all controls must function is not resolved as "pull to disable for 6:1" is a feature. Paul, can you find those swell pots with switches? Even a rotary switch at the lower end of the operating range could have a tick marked "6:1" or "disabled" or something cute. on the panel. Larry Hendry
Message
Re: Mixer idea
1999-03-10 by J. Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.