Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] 320 differences??

2004-03-09 by Mark

On 3/9/04, Scott Juskiw put forth:
>  >They both seem to work fine, except the one I built has a much wider
>  >frequency range.  It is much slower when the knob is all the way
>  >down, and much faster when all the way up, compared to the one I
>  >bought used.  This difference seems to be much greater than the 5%
>  >tolerance of the pots.  Any ideas what might be causing this??  Could
>  >anyone who has several 320's please comment on how your units
>  >differ??  I would like to get them so they have a similar response.
>
>I have four units, all built by myself in assembly line fashion. I've
>measured the maximum frequency (after adding DB-320 daughterboard) of
>eachand found that it ranges from about 450 to about 650 Hz. I'm not
>sure why there is such a variance, but it seems to be normal for this
>module.

Thanks Scott, but if it were only a difference of 200Hz at the top
end, I wouldn't have mentioned it.  Using a tuning meter, with the
knobs at "10", the one I built has a top frequency equivalent to G#
-1, but the one I bought built only goes up to A# -4 (a difference of
about three octaves).  One the low end, without having to bring in a
geologist or building some kind of timer, around "4" on the knobs,
the one I built will cycle once, while the one I bought used will
cycle ten times.  Perhaps one of us made a construction error??
Based on what you say, 320's shouldn't vary that much.   Any idea
where I should look??

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.