Hi, --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, The Old Crow <oldcrow@o...> wrote: > I increased the adjustment on the 485 to let it introduce "bad" IM > distortion, because it sounded musically useful. The bottom line > is, they sound different. I'm not sure if they demos show that (and if I listened to everything posted) since rather the "oddities" of the 485 were shown off, but to me the 480 sounds nicer, more smooth. > Yamaha must have had this great fear that a keyboard player would > be able to place a filter in a state that made it appear as if the > instrument was broken; things like closing the high-pass filter all > the way such that no tone was heard. Ah, this infamous "where did my sound go?" question ;-) > Thus, Yamaha built the GX1 HP-VCF to respond to 1/2 > Oct/V modulation wheres the LPF was 1V/Oct. Similarly, the > CS80 HP filter > is hardwired to track and half the distance as the LP filter on its > modulation input. On the MOTM-480, this hardwired behavior is > part of the FM input (1V/Oct still tracks the same for both > filters, same as in a real CS-80). > Hope this helps(?) Sure! Thanks a lot! Michael.
Message
480 vs. 485 (was: Re: Update)
2004-08-23 by Michael Zacherl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.