Ken Stone's CGS VCO is a variant of the ASM1/Electronotes core design. The PCB offers many control and waveshaping features, but I built only the core, using high quality parts in the exponential converter. The FM input has option switches for EXP/LIN and AC/DC, as the MOTM-300. The pots are like the 310, except for the output mix. There are separate saw and pulse outputs, sync and PWM inputs. It fits into a 1U panel. It's like a 310 plus linear FM and hard sync. Gee, could there be a MOTM-315 with these features?! I'd buy two. Would that be too many VCO? -Richard Brewster Marc Bareille wrote: > Hi , > > I must admit i am a bit in the same situation: i have two 300 and two > 310 and it is clear it is not enough ... also all the MOTM VCO have > the same sound... > > That's why i have designed a new VCO board with the ASM1 core inside > but everything all around has been improved to bring the > ASM1/electronotes core to the MOTM level. The result is a new kind of > "ultra" VCO! The pcb fit with 4 pot MOTM format and the front panel > can be identical to the MOTM300 excepted for the sync plug who is only > an input. The Hard sync switch is present. It do not sound the same at > all, but got the same stability on the expo converter than the > 300/310... The pcb is single side. It is possible to build an exact > copy of the electronote or ASM1 VCO or an "ultra" VCO from the same > pcb. This board is available on order , cost 25 euros each + shipping. > It is not published on my web site yet, but it is a part of the next > site update... If there are amateurs for this beast... > > Cheers, > > Marc B. > > > Richard Brewster wrote: > >> One time I thought I had too many oscillators. I had a beautiful >> Blacet VCO in a Schaeffer panel. As I recall, I built it while >> waiting for my second MOTM-300. But with two MOTM-300 and two >> MOTM-310, I thought that five VCOs was more than I needed. (That was >> before the third cabinet.) I sold the Blacet, but later I regretted >> it. Eventually I added two Cat Girl Synth VCOs, highly customized in >> 1U panels. So now I have six and that's about right. Well, at least >> it's not too many. >> >> -Richard Brewster >> >> "Two of each module is better than one of each." >> >> Jeff Laity wrote: > >
Message
Re: [motm] Module questions
2005-01-27 by Richard Brewster
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.