Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] motm patch documentation project

2005-06-15 by Scott Juskiw

>Does anyone have an opinion one way or another about this? On one
>hand, just using blocks makes a lot sense, mostly because it can get
>pretty ambiguous as to what group things belong in. What does the
>frequency shifter belong in? Osc or Filter? On the other hand, I think
>it's a little easier to read with some catagorization.
>
>In my example patches I use a circle (osc) to both represent a 440
>(it's in self res) and a 300.

Signal sources (oscillators, noise generators, microphone) are often 
represented with a circle. Modifiers (VCF, VCA, inverter) are often 
represented with a triangle (like an op amp). Controllers (ADSR, 
keyboard, sequencer, bias source) are often represented with a 
rectangle. But eventually even this breaks down because LFOs can be 
considered controllers at low frequency or signal sources at audible 
frequency. I think one needs to use the appropriate symbol for the 
module on a per-patch basis. Ask yourself, "Self, is this generating 
an audio signal, generating a control signal, or modifying a signal?" 
Other conventions are that audio signals enter at the left and exit 
at the right of a module. Control signals exit at the left and enter 
at the bottom of a module (but I've got many examples showing control 
signals exiting anywhere). I'll post some scans within the next few 
days.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.