>Does anyone have an opinion one way or another about this? On one >hand, just using blocks makes a lot sense, mostly because it can get >pretty ambiguous as to what group things belong in. What does the >frequency shifter belong in? Osc or Filter? On the other hand, I think >it's a little easier to read with some catagorization. > >In my example patches I use a circle (osc) to both represent a 440 >(it's in self res) and a 300. Signal sources (oscillators, noise generators, microphone) are often represented with a circle. Modifiers (VCF, VCA, inverter) are often represented with a triangle (like an op amp). Controllers (ADSR, keyboard, sequencer, bias source) are often represented with a rectangle. But eventually even this breaks down because LFOs can be considered controllers at low frequency or signal sources at audible frequency. I think one needs to use the appropriate symbol for the module on a per-patch basis. Ask yourself, "Self, is this generating an audio signal, generating a control signal, or modifying a signal?" Other conventions are that audio signals enter at the left and exit at the right of a module. Control signals exit at the left and enter at the bottom of a module (but I've got many examples showing control signals exiting anywhere). I'll post some scans within the next few days.
Message
Re: [motm] motm patch documentation project
2005-06-15 by Scott Juskiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.