FWIW: I agree that: 1) using several noise sources sounds different than using one noise source in several places 2) you shouldn't have to buy a ring mod every time you buy a VCA 3) splitting functionality to create two less-expensive modules is more desirable than creating one module that does everything. Just my $0.02 worth, of course. --Adam > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Haneberg [mailto:phaneber@...] > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:50 PM > To: motm@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [motm] Another thought > > My personal preference would be to split this thing up at this point. > Make a noise source with multiple types of noise outputs including the > uncertainty source. > Make a S&H ASR module and > a quantizer module. > I'd rather have several lower cost modules than a really expensive single > module, and I like the idea of splitting things up and making them more > modular. > > The alternative would possibly push this thing beyond 2U unless some of > the > functions were left out. > > I also agree with Moe about noise sources. If you take two sources and > pan > one left and one right it will sound different than one source panned > center. Having equal energy distributions do not make two sources sound > the > same at a given moment in time. > > Paul H. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...> > To: "MOTM litserv" <motm@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 7:59 PM > Subject: [motm] Another thought > > > >I caould do a $50 retail difference by only having 3 outputs, but they > are > > 14-bit. > > > > Paul S. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
RE: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by Adam Schabtach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.