MOTM

So far I like this one best.  My comments:

It might be more functional with "clk in" and "clk out" as the first
row of jacks (just below the switches) with "in" and "clk cv" as the
second row.  With the signal input jack closer to the four signal
output jacks you don't end up with the clock and signal patch cords
crossing over each other when trying to cascade the modules.

Also, do you think a jack to control "asr / loop" mode might be more
useful than a clock cv?  It seems like it would be fun to have an LFO
or random source switch the module between ASR and loop mode.  It
would also be fun to modulate the internal S&H clock.  Without the
clock CV jack, an equivalent can be achieved using an external clock
source.  However, the asr/loop switching is more difficult to achieve
with external modules.  You could do it with a 700 VC router but you
loose the benefit of the all digital "zero droop" because you are now
doing AD/DA multiple times to achieve the looping.

seth


--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "John Loffink" <jloffink@a...> wrote:
>
> I added my version to the group files, modifying Richard's file to the
> suggestions below.  Plus I added the Synth Tech logo and changed
some fonts
> and lines to better match the MOTM standard.
> 
> John Loffink
> The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
> http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com
> The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
> http://www.wavemakers-synth.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: motm@yahoogroups.com [mailto:motm@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of John
> > Loffink
> > 
> > Richard's comes closest to the MOTM standard.  I would put RATE
over the
> > LIMIT pot, it just seems more natural to grab the top knob for the
rate.
> > 
> > I also liked the jack layout, though I might swap the IN/CLK CV row to
> > top,
> > and put the CLK IN/CLK OUT row second from top.
> > 
> >
>