my guess is that originally the 4-pin connector was designed to carry two grounds, one nice clean analogue one and one dirty digital one. >- and theoretically, less resistance? > >Barry S. > >--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "mate_stubb" <mate_stubb@...> wrote: >> >> There is safety in redundancy. >> >> Moe >> >> --- In motm@yahoogroups.com, Dino Leone <d_p_leone@> wrote: >> > >> > Here's a really stupid question that keeps nagging me >> > for a long time: >> > >> > since both middle pins on the MOTM pwer connectors >> > carry ground, why not use a 3-pin connector instead? >> > What's the advantage having the 4-pin, dual-GND >> > configuration? >> > I guess the question is mainly meant for Paul, but >> > maybe some other people are wondering the same >> > thing... >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Dino >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________ >> > Do You Yahoo!? >> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> > http://mail.yahoo.com >> > >> > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
[motm] Re: stupid power connection question
2006-03-23 by Jason Proctor
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.