Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: VCLFO Part #2

1999-05-02 by J. Larry Hendry

> From: "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@...>
> 
> Things I missed:
> 
> a) the TRI out is unaffected by SHAPE, it's always a TRI. The RAMP at 50%
> *is* a TRI as well.
> On either side, it approaches SAWtooth.

OK, that makes sense to even me.
 
> b) I don't think a dual VCLFO makes sense because how could it differ
from 2
> of the 1Us? The cost
> IS THE SAME.

I agree.  I would rather have two separate units (whether 1 or 2 space)
than a dual LFO if the cost is close to the same.
 
Larry Hendry

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.