Answers to follow. > > he talks about exponential vs. linear VCOs: expo. being for audio signals, > lin. to be used for frequency modulation of other signals (as CVs). are > there any plans for linear MOTM VCOs? Look at the from panel of a MOTM-300. See that switch marked LIN/EXP.... :) > > how would one realize the following envelope: ADS DS DS ... R ? by > chaining ADSRs somehow? No such thing as a DS DS. You have to Decay DOWN to Sustain. I think he meant ADS ADS ADS R which the 800's do with seperate GATE and TRIG. You need a Kenton Pro2000 to do this. > > inverters: will a future MOTM inverter most likely change a signal's phase > 180 degrees, or might it be adjustable over a range? and will it do the > same for CVs? All filters have "reversing attenuators" which act as inverters in the -5 to 0 range on the pot. Seperate reversing attenuators will be offer in the fall. > > would someone tell me the (electrical) difference between mixing and > summing signals? No difference. > > wells describes formant modulation as modulating the cutoff freq of a > carrier with the amplitude of a modulating signal. how does this work in > real life?? will i be able to send a carrier signal into a motm440 and > control its cutoff with a modulating signal sent through an envelope follower? Yep. > > how to 'remove' one side of an AC waveform and be left with only its neg. > DC component or its positive? (am i using proper terminology?) That's sort of tricky. No module yet to do this. > > i know we've been over this before, but why is it not possible to control > the MOTM100's vibrato rate with a pot? Because is not an oscillator, it's a *very* high Q bandpass filter that 'rings', producing the damped sine wave. The frequency is controlled by the ratio of 2 capacitors. Paul S.
Message
Re: [motm] q&a
2000-04-06 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.