MOTM

In a message dated 4/7/2000 12:49:45 AM, williamneumann@... writes:

>
>Just wondering if Paul will come out
>with an old Moog syle 8 or 12 band 
>fixed filter bank with passive R/C
>networks being set up w/
>discrete trasistor pre amp and output
>stages. I'm working on one now myself
>because I have a Bruel & Kaejer 1/3
>oct filter bank from 1959 all passive
>but I can only "dial" one band at a time
>and modification would be a pain in the
>ba-zoo.


I'd like to hear how this project goes. As far as a MOTM fixed filter bank 
goes, I remember the suggestion, "why not just buy a third octave graphic 
EQ?" They do make these pretty cheap now.


 By the way ....I love my dark 
>star and feed  it through MOTM 420s' and the
>big old B&K filter bank to get a tree
>full of locust bugs singing @ 1250 Hz peak
>band pass freq. selection. - Awsome for 
>some of my more ambient music compositions.


My comment about the DSC was based on my finding it needs other modules to 
make interesting sounds with it (like LFOs or EGs as well as one or more CV 
sources), it is a sound effects chip (and has those kind of sounds), and 
really (IMO) doesn't warrant being gutted and rehoused (for an additional $80 
or more) in a MOTM package -- I'd rather spend that money on more MOTM 
modules. 

Once again, if ANYONE DID gut their Blacet modules, I would buy two DSC front 
panels, and a bunch of the stock 50K pots that come with Blacet kits in order 
to just clear up one mess in my house.

John (I noticed everyone who answered my rhetorical question [about whether 
the DSC is worth gutting out and putting in a MOTM package] in the 
affirmative, is still using the original FracRack package) Barlow