MOTM

I don't understand--a delay without signal degradation? What would that be
used for?

:)

I love analog. Even PICs give me the creeps. But I'll keep an open mind.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: revtor@... [mailto:revtor@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 2:40 PM
> To: motm@egroups.com
> Subject: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
>
>
> Ill second the wish for a delay module.
> But I was wondering if it could be digital?  I mean analog is
> nice but with
> digital the delays can be longer with no signal degradation and
> maybe even
> potentially cheaper.  Maybe the digital delay cuts out some of
> the signal at
> the low and high end?  Could these delays be used for CV's as
> well as audio?
> Why is everyone so desiring an analog delay?  Anyway, as long as
> the delay
> time and wet/dry controls are voltage controllable any delay is
> fine with me.
>  Plus Blacet and Moog already have analog delay boxes out, lets
> make a better
> one... Loong delays with a hold option, VC as many params as
> possible, maybe
> be able to sync the delay to a clock or something like that too..
> I was actually considering mounting a Boss delay pedal onto a
> MOTM panel with
> the MOTM knobs and stuff anyway...
> Why is Digital Delay bad?
> Why is analog Delay good?
> food for threads..
> ~SteveM
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
> Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
> registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/3/_/529958/_/956176783/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>