In a message dated 5/1/2000 3:44:59 PM, celesteh@... writes: >Speaking of filterbanks, > >Mother Of All Fixed Filter Bank (MoaFFB) features: > >Every band has three knobs. >1. One to control attenuate the signal coming thru that band. >2. One to tune the band. set the midpoint of the filter. >3. One to set the width of the band > >and of course, there's CV input for every single one of these knobs plus >a >cv attenuator knob per each cv input. so actually 6 knobs per band. > >then all you need is a rack of LFOs ... And she was such a nice girl too <g>. But seriously folks, it's good to see how people are "assimilated." I'm wondering if it's dealing with MOTM that makes everyone on the list start craving for VC everything, or is it rather that those with the craving for elaborate and powerful VC modules are inevitably driven to MOTM? 1000 MOTM module purchases can't be wrong! BTW, I think the idea of a VCF with VC bandwidth (I guess this would be VC slope for a LPF and HPF) would be yet another worthwhile filter project. >but seriously, i think it would be really great to be able to tune a ffb. I suggested this when I first used the Moog, but someone reminded me that a voltage controlled fixed filter bank, would no longer be fixed. John (if it ain't fixed, don't break it) Barlow
Message
Re: [motm] Digest Number 481
2000-05-02 by jwbarlow@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.