In a message dated 5/15/2000 6:18:52 PM, I writes: >Maybe Juergen can answer this since Paul is away ... and he did! While he didn't have time for a lengthy description (not that I would've understood it anyway) he mentioned that in the 820 getting a pot to control the degree of curve was actually very difficult while keeping the module stable and with no offset over the full range (remember, while I might be using this to do weird stuff, a lot -- maybe most -- people will be using this for some sort of portamento control at least some of the time). So an OTA won't work in this application for VC. And similarly, a VCA would work but would also most likely introduce problems with offset and the rest. I've lived without VC curve shape on a lag processor this long, I don't think I need it now. JB What >I'm >wondering is if the curve shape control of the MOTM 820 does something >like >this (output to VC input)? If so, can this be done externally (i.e., patch >the output to the VC input) through a VCA to allow VC curve shape control? >BTW, I don't really think VC curve shape is that big of deal -- while being >nice to have, I'm not at the moment sure how I'd use it. >JB > >In a message dated 5/15/2000 3:35:39 AM, davevosh@... writes: > >><< except the linear / expo shape). >> >> >> >>larry, >>you make the module sound quite nice but, if we`ve gone to all this trouble >>to make it fantastic, why not add another ota and jack and make this >last >>function vc-able, too ? especially if the board isn`t finished yet, maybe >>this can be squeezed in - ? >
Message
Re: [motm] While Paul's away....
2000-05-18 by jwbarlow@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.