On Tue, 23 May 2000 davevosh@... wrote: > crow, > i`d love to see a source of uncorrelated ( say 3 or 4 ) random triggers > derived from such a noise source. any chance ? > best, > dave v. Uncorrelated? That would require good old shot noise to be truly random between concurrent triggers. In a PIC, I can rig several long feedback shift registers and thus create pseudo-random noise by instructing the regs to shift at a rate of 40KHz, but unless the seed number can be set by some sort of "real-world random" for each register, the triggers would actually be correlated by the finite (long, yes, but still finite) shift register bit patterns. Hm, now this has me thinking. I have methods I've used in the past to get fairly "true random" seeds that involve detecting the error in thermocouple cold-junction compensation servo loops, but that might not be the best solution here (as I'm not trying to build a process controller here). What might be of more use to us however is some way of setting specific random seeds by hand and then load/start the registers. A "random" sequencer for triggers is what I'm arriving at here. Some way to set a seed with a load jack/pushbutton, a clock rate switch to run it at 40KHz for audio uses or select a manual shift clock from a VCO or whatever. I'll have to puzzle over it a bit to see if what I'm thinking actually works the way I want it to. And here I just wanted to use my PIC part that I use to replace the flimsy digital noise chip Prophet-5s used. Now look what it has become. ;) Crow /**/
Message
Re: [motm] LFO Tap and Division
2000-05-24 by The Old Crow
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.