BUT: If I pay for a "legal" copy of Photoshop 5.0 (which I did), then I'm expempt! Adobe pays for the license. Paul S. ----- Original Message ----- From: Brousseau, Paul E (Paul) <noise@...> To: <motm@egroups.com> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 11:33 AM Subject: RE: [motm] How come UniSys is not rich? [OT!] > No, of course the guy who downloads a .GIF wouldn't pay. That would be > silly. :) But in theory Paul S. (or whoever creates the images) would have > to pay as the guy who does the compression. Or do I still have it wrong? > Here's the article on slashdot: > http://slashdot.org/articles/99/08/29/0722236.shtml. (Warning, there's a > LOT of user comments, so its a big page.) > > OK, here's what I've gathered from subsequent pages... UniSys (the GIF guys) > want a licence fee from software developers that use their compression > routine AND from "web sites" (does this mean owner, creater, who?) that have > .GIFs from a questionable source (not necesarily created by software from > developers who paid the licence fee). > > --PBr > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Bradley [SMTP:daveb@...] > > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 9:19 AM > > To: motm@egroups.com > > Subject: RE: [motm] How come UniSys is not rich? > > > > > The only problem is that the .GIF compression routine is copyright'ed, > > so > > > you're theoretically supposed to pay whenever you use the compression > > > routine. Search http://www.slashdot.org for details, I don't > > > remember them > > > clearly. At the same time, I highly doubt that the owner of the > > > copyrights > > > is going to search out every "illegal" user and prosecute. > > > > > > > Actually, I believe the end user doesn't pay, it's the software maker who > > includes the compression algorithms which must pay. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > FREE 16 track CD with Purchase at Virgin Megastore Online! > http://click.egroups.com/1/4208/5/_/529958/_/959358766/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Message
Re: [motm] How come UniSys is not rich? [OT!]
2000-05-26 by Paul Schreiber
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.