MOTM

"JW," as my friends (i.e., Dave) call me, chiming in on the VC Lag idea. 
Note: to make a STUDLY Lag processor which already has a VC (reversing 
attenuator) input, you merely need to patch the output into the VC input and 
vary the attenuator to go from Log through zero to Exponential. A switch 
would be a benefit and a shape knob (as I've described) wouldn't be overkill 
-- and yes, with a separate VC input for Rise and Fall times, it could beat 
up a S(pl)erge DSG.

JB

In a message dated 5/25/99 7:13:58 AM, daveb@... writes:

>A SIMPLE lag processor would have a single knob to control both rise and
>fall time. It might allow voltage control of the rise and fall time also.

>A BETTER lag processor would have separate controls and CV inputs for rise
>and fall time. Add triggering capability and you have the Serge Universal
>Slope Generator, an extremely flexible module which JW described in detail
>in a post on 3/7/99.

>A STUDLY lag processor has separate rise and fall controls, AND allows
>you
>to vary the response from linear to exponential (as in the Emu design).