Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

RE: [motm] VCDO?

2000-07-17 by Tony Karavidas

Wow Cary, that's scary! (Hey , that rhymed) 

It sounds very similar to something I'm working on now...

Tony



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cary Roberts [mailto:cary.roberts@...]
> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 9:51 PM
> To: motm
> Subject: Re: [motm] VCDO?
> 
> 
> >However, I still don't fully understand the desire of those who want 
> >wavetable oscillators.  They give your nice sounding analog 
> synth an annoying 
> >sterile digital sound that chipmunks when the pitch changes.  Also 
> >samplers/wave editors are so much more flexible in that 
> department anyway, 
> >and can be played through an MOTM system.
> 
> Anyone who says this has never played a SCI Prophet VS.  Of course
> comparing a single VCDO to four 8x DCOs isn't really an accurate
> comparison.  Ideally a MOTM VCDO wouldn't be just a wavetable
> oscillator.  It'd be much cooler if it could also run in the subsonic
> range and function as a LFO.  Add a four digit display, encoder,
> and a trigger input so it can also act as a programmable multistage
> looping envelope.  Now that would be cool.
> 
> -Cary
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds!
> 1. Fill in the brief application
> 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
> 3. Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR
> http://click.egroups.com/1/6628/6/_/529958/_/963809568/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.