Wow Cary, that's scary! (Hey , that rhymed) It sounds very similar to something I'm working on now... Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: Cary Roberts [mailto:cary.roberts@...] > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 9:51 PM > To: motm > Subject: Re: [motm] VCDO? > > > >However, I still don't fully understand the desire of those who want > >wavetable oscillators. They give your nice sounding analog > synth an annoying > >sterile digital sound that chipmunks when the pitch changes. Also > >samplers/wave editors are so much more flexible in that > department anyway, > >and can be played through an MOTM system. > > Anyone who says this has never played a SCI Prophet VS. Of course > comparing a single VCDO to four 8x DCOs isn't really an accurate > comparison. Ideally a MOTM VCDO wouldn't be just a wavetable > oscillator. It'd be much cooler if it could also run in the subsonic > range and function as a LFO. Add a four digit display, encoder, > and a trigger input so it can also act as a programmable multistage > looping envelope. Now that would be cool. > > -Cary > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! > 1. Fill in the brief application > 2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds > 3. Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR > http://click.egroups.com/1/6628/6/_/529958/_/963809568/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >
Message
RE: [motm] VCDO?
2000-07-17 by Tony Karavidas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.