MOTM

oooh I see, one of our utility ideas. yes id like one, perhaps combined with our
invertor, and attenuator ideas, but i beg of everyone....pleeeeeease, the mixer
module first???  : )
Jim

Nathan Hunsicker wrote:

> a patch bay wouldn't allow for the signal attenuation/amplification.
> check out:
> http://www.egroups.com/files/motm/INTERFACE.GIF
> it might help you to see what i am talking about. -Nate
> --- In motm@egroups.com, weld@b... wrote:
> > patch bays work good for this.
> > Jim
> >
> > Nathan Hunsicker wrote:
> >
> > > Any chance that we'll ever see an "effects loop" module? Maybe a module
> > > with 4 in's and 4 outs that would take a 10v p-p signal and drop it to
> > > line or instrument level to run through external effects and then take
> > > the line or instrument level signal and amplify it back up to MOTM
> > > levels. It would be usefull for using stomp boxes, effects processors,
> > > tuners, tape delays, etc... If it's not a viable MOTM idea, then maybe
> > > a DIY effort? any thoughts? -Nate
> > >
> > > --- In motm@egroups.com, "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
> > > > Actually, I was not that impressed. The A.R.T. Leveller does a better job.
> > > > And I can sleep
> > > > at night.
> > > >
> > > > Paul S.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Steve Maietta" <revtor@a...>
> > > > To: <motm@egroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:22 AM
> > > > Subject: [motm] Paul, listen to reason..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Didn't you say that you've designed and tested a tube
> > > > > overdrive/distortion curcut?
> > > > > You seriously wouldn't release it because of high voltage concerns?
> > > > > I mean, it's designed already!  What if we all promise not to stand
> > > > > in water and play with the circuts?  You can put some kind of warning
> > > > > on it, maybe get the high voltage stuff prebuilt, leave the rest to
> > > > > us kit builders.
> > > > > aw gee Paul C'mon.....
> > > > > ~Steve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>