In a message dated 1/28/2001 12:42:58 PM, thudson@... writes: >I'd rather see the sequencer broken out into separate modules >like the SuperMoe. Alternately, try to keep the cost down on >the first MOTM sequencer. As soon as you have one you'll >want two, ad infinitum. Four simple sequencers are probably >more useful than one monster sequencer. Yeah, absolutely! Although, I've used some very basic sequencers (8 stages one row in one direction only with no hold or random inputs, only a reset and a clock input) which aren't terribly useful -- there are some basic additions that are essential for a good general purpose sequecer (Moe listed many). >And while I'm at it, I'd like to vote for a SuperMoe Panel >run. An interesting idea! I guess Moe (or someone) would also have to layout the associated PCBs -- but there might be a fair amount of interest in something like this. JB
Message
Re: [motm] Re: sequencer design - NOT SuperMoe feature - dash of reality?
2001-01-29 by jwbarlow@aol.com