That doesn't mean I don't need the high end oneI have to have every one of those. but I can only afford one J G Wong wrote: > > A one space 5-7 note sequencer is the best utility module bar none. T > Dream recorded sequencers onto mellotrron tapes 1 key one sequence. > High end solutions are audiophile delusions.. see the littlre Buchla > and Serge ones, almost invisible, players use them for everythinh > > g Wong > > jwbarlow@... wrote: > > > > In a message dated 1/28/2001 12:42:58 PM, thudson@... writes: > > > > >I'd rather see the sequencer broken out into separate modules > > >like the SuperMoe. Alternately, try to keep the cost down on > > >the first MOTM sequencer. As soon as you have one you'll > > >want two, ad infinitum. Four simple sequencers are probably > > >more useful than one monster sequencer. > > > > Yeah, absolutely! Although, I've used some very basic sequencers (8 stages > > one row in one direction only with no hold or random inputs, only a reset and > > a clock input) which aren't terribly useful -- there are some basic additions > > that are essential for a good general purpose sequecer (Moe listed many). > > > > >And while I'm at it, I'd like to vote for a SuperMoe Panel > > >run. > > > > An interesting idea! I guess Moe (or someone) would also have to layout the > > associated PCBs -- but there might be a fair amount of interest in something > > like this. > > JB > > >
Message
Re: [motm] Re: sequencer design - NOT SuperMoe feature - dash of reality?
2001-01-29 by J G Wong
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.